summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/draft-schanzen-gns.txt
blob: 4195b59702b4b1fef8d90c1b6fa03d388080b414 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064




Independent Stream                                       M. Schanzenbach
Internet-Draft                                               GNUnet e.V.
Intended status: Informational                               C. Grothoff
Expires: 24 January 2020                           Berner Fachhochschule
                                                                  B. Fix
                                                             GNUnet e.V.
                                                            23 July 2019


                   The GNU Name System Specification
                         draft-schanzen-gns-00

Abstract

   This document contains the GNU Name System (GNS) technical
   specification.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 January 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
   as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.




Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Resource Records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  PKEY  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.2.  GNS2DNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.3.  LEHO  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.4.  NICK  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.5.  BOX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   4.  Publishing Records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     4.1.  Key Derivations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     4.2.  Resource Records Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     4.3.  Record Data Encryption and Decryption . . . . . . . . . .  11
   5.  Internationalization and Character Encoding . . . . . . . . .  13
   6.  Name Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     6.1.  Entry Zone  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     6.2.  Record Retrieval  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     6.3.  Record Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   7.  Zone Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   8.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   10. Test Vectors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   11. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19

1.  Introduction

   The Domain Name System (DNS) is a unique distributed database and a
   vital service for most Internet applications.  While DNS is
   distributed, it relies on centralized, trusted registrars to provide
   globally unique names.  As the awareness of the central role DNS
   plays on the Internet rises, various institutions are using their
   power (including legal means) to engage in attacks on the DNS, thus
   threatening the global availability and integrity of information on
   the Internet.

   DNS was not designed with security as a goal.  This makes it very
   vulnerable, especially to attackers that have the technical
   capabilities of an entire nation state at their disposal.  This
   specification describes a censorship-resistant, privacy-preserving
   and decentralized name system: The GNU Name System (GNS).  It is
   designed to provide a secure alternative to DNS, especially when
   censorship or manipulation is encountered.  GNS can bind names to any
   kind of cryptographically secured token, enabling it to double in
   some respects as even as an alternative to some of today's Public Key
   Infrastructures, in particular X.509 for the Web.




Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   This document contains the GNU Name System (GNS) technical
   specification of the GNU Name System (GNS), a fully decentralized and
   censorship-resistant name system.  GNS provides a privacy-enhancing
   alternative to the Domain Name System (DNS).  The design of GNS
   incorporates the capability to integrate and coexist with DNS.  GNS
   is based on the principle of a petname system and builds on ideas
   from the Simple Distributed Security Infrastructure (SDSI),
   addressing a central issue with the decentralized mapping of secure
   identifiers to memorable names: namely the impossibility of providing
   a global, secure and memorable mapping without a trusted authority.
   GNS uses the transitivity in the SDSI design to replace the trusted
   root with secure delegation of authority thus making petnames useful
   to other users while operating under a very strong adversary model.

   This document defines the normative wire format of resource records,
   resolution processes, cryptographic routines and security
   considerations for use by implementors.


2.  Zones

   A zone in GNS is defined by a public/private ECDSA key pair (d,zk),
   where d is the private key and zk the corresponding public key.  GNS
   employs the curve parameters of the twisted edwards representation of
   Curve25519 [RFC7748] (a.k.a. edwards25519) with the ECDSA scheme
   ([RFC6979]).  In the following, we use the following naming
   convention for our cryptographic primitives:

   d  is a 256-bit ECDSA private key.  In GNS, records are signed using
      a key derived from "d" as described in Section 4.

   p  is the prime of edwards25519 as defined in [RFC7748], i.e.  2^255
      - 19.

   B  is the group generator (X(P),Y(P)) of edwards25519 as defined in
      [RFC7748].

   L  is the prime-order subgroup of edwards25519 in [RFC7748].

   zk  is the ECDSA public key corresponding to d.  It is defined in
      [RFC6979] as the curve point d*B where B is the group generator of
      the elliptic curve.  The public key is used to uniquely identify a
      GNS zone and is referred to as the "zone key".








Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


3.  Resource Records

   A GNS implementor MUST provide a mechanism to create and manage
   resource records for local zones.  A local zone is established by
   creating a zone key pair.  Records may be added to each zone, hence a
   (local) persistency mechanism for resource records and zones must be
   provided.  This local zone database is used by the GNS resolver
   implementation and to publish record information.

   A GNS resource record holds the data of a specific record in a zone.
   The resource record format is defined as follows:

            0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
            +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
            |                   EXPIRATION                  |
            +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
            |       DATA SIZE       |          TYPE         |
            +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
            |           FLAGS       |        DATA           /
            +-----+-----+-----+-----+                       /
            /                                               /
            /                                               /

                                  Figure 1

   where:

   EXPIRATION  denotes the absolute 64-bit expiration date of the
      record.  In microseconds since midnight (0 hour), January 1, 1970
      in network byte order.

   DATA SIZE  denotes the 32-bit size of the DATA field in bytes and in
      network byte order.

   TYPE  is the 32-bit resource record type.  This type can be one of
      the GNS resource records as defined in Section 3 or a DNS record
      type as defined in [RFC1035] or any of the complementary
      standardized DNS resource record types.  This value must be stored
      in network byte order.  Note that values below 2^16 are reserved
      for allocation via IANA ([RFC6895]).

   FLAGS  is a 32-bit resource record flags field (see below).

   DATA  the variable-length resource record data payload.  The contents
      are defined by the respective type of the resource record.

   Flags indicate metadata surrounding the resource record.  A flag
   value of 0 indicates that all flags are unset.  The following



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   illustrates the flag distribution in the 32-bit flag value of a
   resource record:

            ... 5       4         3        2        1        0
            ------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
            / ... | SHADOW | EXPREL |   /    | PRIVATE|    /   |
            ------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

                                  Figure 2

   where:

   SHADOW  If this flag is set, this record should be ignored by
      resolvers unless all (other) records of the same record type have
      expired.  Used to allow zone publishers to facilitate good
      performance when records change by allowing them to put future
      values of records into the DHT.  This way, future values can
      propagate and may be cached before the transition becomes active.

   EXPREL  The expiration time value of the record is a relative time
      (still in microseconds) and not an absolute time.  This flag
      should never be encountered by a resolver for records obtained
      from the DHT, but might be present when a resolver looks up
      private records of a zone hosted locally.

   PRIVATE  This is a private record of this peer and it should thus not
      be published in the DHT.  Thus, this flag should never be
      encountered by a resolver for records obtained from the DHT.
      Private records should still be considered just like regular
      records when resolving labels in local zones.

3.1.  PKEY

   In GNS, a delegation of a label to a zone is represented through a
   PKEY record.  A PKEY resource record contains the public key of the
   zone to delegate to.  A PKEY record MUST be the only record under a
   label.  No other records are allowed.  A PKEY DATA entry has the
   following format:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                   PUBLIC KEY                  |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                  Figure 3



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


3.2.  GNS2DNS

   It is possible to delegate a label back into DNS through a GNS2DNS
   record.  The resource record contains a DNS name for the resolver to
   continue with in DNS followed by a DNS server.  Both names are in the
   format defined in [RFC1034] for DNS names.  If a resolver encounters
   a GNS2DNS record it is expected that it first resolves the IP(s) of
   the DNS server(s).  GNS2DNS records MAY contain numeric IPv4 or IPv6
   addresses, allowing the resolver to skip this step.  The DNS server
   names may themselves be names in GNS or DNS.  If the DNS server name
   ends in ".+", the rest of the name is to be interpreted relative to
   the zone of the GNS2DNS record.  Then, the DNS name from the GNS2DNS
   record is appended to the remainder of the name to be resolved, and
   resolved by querying the name server(s).  Multiple GNS2DNS records
   may be stored under the same label, in which case the resolver MUST
   try all of them.  However, if multiple GNS2DNS records are present,
   the DNS name MUST be identical for all of them.  A GNS2DNS DATA entry
   has the following format:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                    DNS NAME                   |
              /                                               /
              /                                               /
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                 DNS SERVER NAME               |
              /                                               /
              /                                               /
              |                                               |
              +-----------------------------------------------+

                                  Figure 4

3.3.  LEHO

   Legacy hostname records can be used by applications that are expected
   to supply a DNS name on the application layer.  The most common use
   case is HTTP virtual hosting, which as-is would not work with GNS
   names as those may not be globally unique.  A LEHO resource record
   contains an UTF-8 string (which is not 0-terminated) representing the
   legacy hostname to use.  It is expected to be found together in a
   single resource record with an IPv4 or IPv6 address.  A LEHO DATA
   entry has the following format:







Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                 LEGACY HOSTNAME               |
              /                                               /
              /                                               /
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                  Figure 5

   NOTE: If an application uses a LEHO value in an HTTP request header
   (e.g.  "Host:" header) it must be converted to a punycode
   representation [RFC5891].

3.4.  NICK

   Nickname records can be used by zone administrators to publish an
   indication on what label this zone prefers to be referred to.  This
   is a suggestion to other zones what label to use when creating a PKEY
   Section 3.1 record containing this zone's public zone key.  A NICK
   resource record contains an UTF-8 string (not 0-terminated)
   representing the preferred label.  This string may NOT inlcude a ".".
   This record SHOULD only be stored under the empty label "@".  A NICK
   DATA entry has the following format:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                  NICKNAME                     |
              /                                               /
              /                                               /
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                  Figure 6

3.5.  BOX

   In GNS, every "." in a name delegates to another zone, and GNS
   lookups are expected to return all of the required useful information
   in one record set.  This is incompatible with the special labels used
   by DNS for SRV and TLSA records.  Thus, GNS defines the BOX record
   format to box up SRV and TLSA records and include them in the record
   set of the label they are associated with.  For example, a TLSA
   record for "_https._tcp.foo.gnu" will be stored in the record set of
   "foo.gnu" as a BOX record with service (SVC) 443 (https) and protocol
   (PROTO) 6 (tcp) and record_type "TLSA".  When a BOX record is
   received, a GNS resolver must unbox it if the name to be resolved
   continues with "_SERVICE._PROTO", otherwise it is to be left



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 7]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   untouched.  This way, TLSA (and SRV) records do not require a
   separate network request, and TLSA records become inseparable from
   the corresponding address records.  A BOX DATA entry has the
   following format:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |   PROTO   |    SVC    |       TYPE            |
              +-----------+-----------------------------------+
              |                 RECORD DATA                   |
              /                                               /
              /                                               /
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                  Figure 7

   PROTO  the 16-bit protocol number, e.g. 6 for tcp.  In network byte
      order.

   SVC  the 16-bit service value of the boxed record, i.e. the port
      number.  In network byte order.

   TYPE  is the 32-bit record type of the boxed record.  In network byte
      order.

   RECORD DATA  is a variable length field containing the "DATA" format
      of TYPE as defined for the respective TYPE in DNS.

4.  Publishing Records

   GNS resource records are published in a distributed hash table (DHT).
   We assume that a DHT provides two functions: GET(key) and
   PUT(key,value).  In GNS, resource records are grouped by their
   respective labels, encrypted and published together in a single
   resource records block (RRBLOCK) in the DHT under a key "q": PUT(q,
   RRBLOCK).  The key "q" which is derived from the zone key "zk" and
   the respective label of the contained records.

4.1.  Key Derivations

   Given a label, the DHT key "q" is derived as follows:

            PRK_h := HKDF-Extract ("key-derivation", zk)
            h := HKDF-Expand (PRK_h, label | "gns", 512 / 8)
            d_h := h * d mod L
            zk_h := h mod L * zk
            q := SHA512 (zk_h)



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 8]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   We use a hash-based key derivation function (HKDF) as defined in
   [RFC5869].  We use HMAC-SHA512 for the extraction phase and HMAC-
   SHA256 for the expansion phase.

   PRK_h  is key material retrieved using an HKDF using the string "key-
      derivation" as salt and the public zone key "zk" as initial keying
      material.

   h  is the 512-bit HKDF expansion result.  The expansion info input is
      a concatenation of the label and string "gns".

   d  is the 256-bit private zone key as defined in Section 2.

   label  is a UTF-8 string under which the resource records are
      published.

   d_h  is a 256-bit private key derived from the "d" using the keying
      material "h".

   zk_h  is a 256-bit public key derived from the zone key "zk" using
      the keying material "h".

   L  is the prime-order subgroup as defined in Section 2.

   q  Is the 512-bit DHT key under which the resource records block is
      published.  It is the SHA512 hash over the public key "zk_h"
      corresponding to the derived private key "d_h".

   We point out that the multiplication of "zk" with "h" is a point
   multiplication, while the multiplication of "d" with "h" is a scalar
   multiplication.

4.2.  Resource Records Block

   GNS records are grouped by their labels and published as a single
   block in the DHT.  The contained resource records are encrypted using
   a symmetric encryption scheme.  A GNS implementation must publish
   RRBLOCKs in accordance to the properties and recommendations of the
   underlying DHT.  This may include a periodic refresh publication.  A
   GNS RRBLOCK has the following format:











Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020                [Page 9]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                   SIGNATURE                   |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                  PUBLIC KEY                   |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |         SIZE          |       PURPOSE         |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                   EXPIRATION                  |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                    BDATA                      /
              /                                               /
              /                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                  Figure 8

   where:

   SIGNATURE  A 512-bit ECDSA deterministic signature compliant with
      [RFC6979].  The signature is computed over the data following the
      PUBLIC KEY field.  The signature is created using the derived
      private key "d_h" (see Section 4).

   PUBLIC KEY  is the 256-bit public key "zk_h" to be used to verify
      SIGNATURE.  The wire format of this value is defined in [RFC8032],
      Section 5.1.5.

   SIZE  A 32-bit value containing the length of the signed data
      following the PUBLIC KEY field in network byte order.  This value
      always includes the length of the fields SIZE (4), PURPOSE (4) and
      EXPIRATION (8) in addition to the length of the BDATA.  While a
      32-bit value is used, implementations MAY refuse to publish blocks
      beyond a certain size significantly below 4 GB.  However, a
      minimum block size of 62 kilobytes MUST be supported.

   PURPOSE  A 32-bit signature purpose flag.  This field MUST be 15 (in
      network byte order).



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 10]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   EXPIRATION  Specifies when the RRBLOCK expires and the encrypted
      block SHOULD be removed from the DHT and caches as it is likely
      stale.  However, applications MAY continue to use non-expired
      individual records until they expire.  The value MUST be set to
      the expiration time of the resource record contained within this
      block with the smallest expiration time.  If a records block
      includes shadow records, then the maximum expiration time of all
      shadow records with matching type and the expiration times of the
      non-shadow records is considered.  This is a 64-bit absolute date
      in microseconds since midnight (0 hour), January 1, 1970 in
      network byte order.

   BDATA  The encrypted resource records with a total size of SIZE - 16.

4.3.  Record Data Encryption and Decryption

   A symmetric encryption scheme is used to encrypt the resource records
   set RDATA into the BDATA field of a GNS RRBLOCK.  The wire format of
   the RDATA looks as follows:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |     RR COUNT          |        EXPIRA-        /
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              /         -TION         |       DATA SIZE       |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |         TYPE          |          FLAGS        |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                      DATA                     /
              /                                               /
              /                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                   EXPIRATION                  |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |       DATA SIZE       |          TYPE         |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |           FLAGS       |        DATA           /
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+                       /
              /                       +-----------------------/
              /                       |                       /
              +-----------------------+                       /
              /                     PADDING                   /
              /                                               /

                                  Figure 9

   where:




Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 11]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   RR COUNT  A 32-bit value containing the number of variable-length
      resource records which are following after this field in network
      byte order.

   EXPIRATION, DATA SIZE, TYPE, FLAGS and DATA  These fields were defined in
      the resource record format in Section 3.  There MUST be a total of
      RR COUNT of these resource records present.

   PADDING  The padding MUST contain the value 0 in all octets.  The
      padding MUST ensure that the size of the RDATA WITHOUT the RR
      COUNT field is a power of two.  As a special exception, record
      sets with (only) a PKEY record type are never padded.  Note that a
      record set with a PKEY record MUST NOT contain other records.

   The symmetric keys and initialization vectors are derived from the
   record label and the zone key "zk".  For decryption of the resource
   records block payload, the key material "K" and initialization vector
   "IV" for the symmetric cipher are derived as follows:

            PRK_k := HKDF-Extract ("gns-aes-ctx-key", zk)
            PRK_iv := HKDF-Extract ("gns-aes-ctx-iv", zk)
            K := HKDF-Expand (PRK_k, label, 512 / 8);
            IV := HKDF-Expand (PRK_iv, label, 256 / 8)

   HKDF is a hash-based key derivation function as defined in [RFC5869].
   Specifically, HMAC-SHA512 is used for the extraction phase and HMAC-
   SHA256 for the expansion phase.  The output keying material is 64
   octets (512 bit) for the symmetric keys and 32 octets (256 bit) for
   the initialization vectors.  We divide the resulting keying material
   "K" into a 256-bit AES [RFC3826] key and a 256-bit TWOFISH [TWOFISH]
   key:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                    AES KEY                    |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                  TWOFISH KEY                  |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                 Figure 10





Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 12]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   Similarly, we divide "IV" into a 128-bit initialization vector and a
   128-bit initialization vector:

              0     8     16    24    32    40    48    56
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                    AES IV                     |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
              |                  TWOFISH IV                   |
              |                                               |
              +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                                 Figure 11

   The keys and IVs are used for a CFB128-AES-256 and CFB128-TWOFISH-256
   chained symmetric cipher.  Both ciphers are used in Cipher FeedBack
   (CFB) mode [RFC3826].

            RDATA := AES(AES KEY, AES IV, TWOFISH(TWOFISH KEY, TWOFISH IV, BDATA))
            BDATA := TWOFISH(TWOFISH KEY, TWOFISH IV, AES(AES KEY, AES IV, RDATA))

5.  Internationalization and Character Encoding

   All labels in GNS are encoded in UTF-8 [RFC3629].  This does not
   include any DNS names found in DNS records, such as CNAME records,
   which are internationalized through the IDNA specifications
   [RFC5890].

6.  Name Resolution

   TODO

6.1.  Entry Zone

   There are three sources from which the entry zone can be determined
   which MUST be queried in this order:

   1.  Check if top-level domain maps to a local zone key.

   2.  Check if top-level domain maps to a local zone name.

   3.  Check if a configuration exists that maps a prefix to an external
       zone key.

   If the TLD is a Base32-encoded public zone key "zk", the entry zone
   of the resolution process is implicitly given by the name.





Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 13]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


            Example name: www.example.<Base32(zk)>
            => Entry zone: zk
            => Name to resolve from entry zone: www.example

   Each local zone is associated with a single GNS label.  If this label
   is the top-level domain (TLD) of the name to resolve, resolution MUST
   start from this local zone.

              Example name: www.example.gnu
              Local zones:
              fr = (d0,zk0)
              gnu = (d1,zk1)
              com = (d2,zk2)
              ...
              => Entry zone: zk1
              => Name to resolve from entry zone: www.example

   If no matching local zone for the TLD is found, external prefix to
   zone mappings are checked.  External prefix to zone key mapping
   SHOULD be configurable through the GNS implementation.  A mapping has
   the form "prefix = public zone key".  The prefix may consist of
   multiple GNS labels concatenated with a ".".  If multiple prefixes
   match the name to resolve, the longest prefix is chosen.  The prefix
   length of two results cannot be equal, as this would indicate a
   misconfiguration.

              Example name: www.example.gnu
              Local prefix mappings:
              gnu = zk0
              example.gnu = zk1
              example.com = zk2
              ...
              => Entry zone: zk1
              => Name to resolve from entry zone: www

6.2.  Record Retrieval

   In order to resolve a name in GNS, a type MAY be given.  However,
   filtering of record results according to type is done after the
   resource record set is retrieved.

   In each step of the recursive name resolution, there is an
   authoritative zone zk and a name to resolve which may be empty.
   Initially, the authoritative zone is the entry zone.  If the name is
   empty, it is interpreted as the apex label "@".

   1.  Extract the right-most label from the name to look up.




Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 14]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   2.  Calculate q using the label and zk.

   3.  Perform a DHT query GET(q) to retrieve the RRBLOCK.

   4.  Verify the RRBLOCK and decrypt the BDATA contained in it.

   Upon receiving the RRBLOCK from the DHT, apart from verifying the
   provided signature, the resolver MUST check that the authoritative
   zone key was used to sign the record: The derived zone key "h*zk"
   must match the public key provided in the RRBLOCK.

6.3.  Record Processing

   If the remainder of the name to resolve is not empty, the records
   result MUST consist of a single PKEY record.  The recursion is then
   continued with the PKEY record value as new authoritative zone.

   If the remainder of the name to resolve is empty but we have received
   a record set containing only a single PKEY record, the recursion is
   continued with the PKEY as authoritative zone and the empty apex
   label "@" as remaining name.  If the record type to be resolved is
   PKEY, the PKEY record set is returned and the resolution is
   concluded.

   If the remainder of the name to resolve is empty and the records set
   does not consist of a PKEY record, the record set is the result and
   the resolution is concluded.

7.  Zone Revocation

   TODO

8.  Security Considerations

   TODO

9.  IANA Considerations

   This will be fun

10.  Test Vectors

   The following represents a test vector for a record of type MX with a
   priority of 10 and the mail hostname mail.example.com.







Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 15]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


            label := "mail"

            d :=
            71199f7b287cc77a
            0d21b5e40a77cb1d
            f89333903b284fe8
            1878bf47f3b39da0

            zk (public zone key) :=
            dff911496d025d7e
            0885c03d19153e99
            4f213f23ea719eca
            17fc32dc410e082e

            h :=
            2af3275a9cf90e54
            f2dbf7930be76fb9
            5e7c80b1416f8ca6
            dc50ce8e1fb759b9
            fedcdcf546c17e9b
            4c4f23632855c053
            6668e9f684f4dc33
            6d656b27392b0fee

            d_h :=
            01fb61f482c17633
            77611c4c2509e0f3
            81b0e7e4405c10bd
            0017c802f7d32e18

            q (query key) :=
            6fce4deddc5ad681
            f4e29a3310767e3b
            8b38bc1b276ce2ba
            9bf1b49df1e120a3
            20ecc9dffb68416f
            11729ad878ad3bdf
            d0b4db2626b620d7
            8e0604e4393c66a3

            AES_KEY :=
            afefd21a087a150d
            6757741a4eda02a5
            65df7ca86ba44b21
            3f8106c0071eaf01

            AES_IV :=
            a808b929bc9fad7a



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 16]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


            686bbe3432bed77a

            TWOFISH_KEY :=
            c9d0089df01d0bf4
            e4c8db4b2ccc7328
            3425e8a811ae59d2
            99e2747285d2a479

            TWOFISH_IV :=
            071be189a9d236f9
            b4a3654bb8c281d4

            RDATA :=
            0000000100059412 RR COUNT | EXPIRA-
            09ddea0f00000014  -TION    | DATA SIZE (20)
            0000000f00000000 TYPE (15=MX) | FLAGS (0)
            000a046d61696c07 Priority (10) |4 | mail | 7
            6578616d706c6503 example | 3
            636f6d0000000000 com | \0 | Followed by
            0000000000000000 24 bytes of padding to 2^6
            0000000000000000
            00000000


            RRBLOCK :=
            055cb070e05fe6de SIGNATURE
            ad694a50e5b4dedd
            b9fdcbdbae004f65
            afc99ba9c5a3bb54
            07e731a34680ee33
            ae0de7bfeda7d2b7
            8c6b854a008b1b54
            10df4f39f5ba9f46____________
            8cb514a56c0eaae0 zk_h
            56745158a63ee4dd
            76853cb9545e326e
            76d7fa920f818291____________
            000000540000000f SIZE (=84) | PURPOSE (=15)
            0005941209dde25b EXPIRATION
            d99d08fa123da096 BDATA
            66c2fb9bf020a85d
            e80818d0a84059a8
            5eee901a66459e5e
            3d1a10b29a5b8354
            1b58636781166b9a
            642920eee8e7a65a
            001fd19a6406a721
            713f0a0d



Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 17]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


11.  Normative References

   [RFC1034]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
              STD 13, RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1034>.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,
              November 1987, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.

   [RFC3629]  Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
              10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
              2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.

   [RFC3826]  Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The
              Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the
              SNMP User-based Security Model", RFC 3826,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3826, June 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3826>.

   [RFC5869]  Krawczyk, H. and P. Eronen, "HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand
              Key Derivation Function (HKDF)", RFC 5869,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5869, May 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5869>.

   [RFC5890]  Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for
              Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",
              RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.

   [RFC5891]  Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in
              Applications (IDNA): Protocol", RFC 5891,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5891, August 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>.

   [RFC6895]  Eastlake 3rd, D., "Domain Name System (DNS) IANA
              Considerations", BCP 42, RFC 6895, DOI 10.17487/RFC6895,
              April 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6895>.

   [RFC6979]  Pornin, T., "Deterministic Usage of the Digital Signature
              Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature
              Algorithm (ECDSA)", RFC 6979, DOI 10.17487/RFC6979, August
              2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6979>.

   [RFC7748]  Langley, A., Hamburg, M., and S. Turner, "Elliptic Curves
              for Security", RFC 7748, DOI 10.17487/RFC7748, January
              2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7748>.




Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 18]

Internet-Draft             The GNU Name System                 July 2019


   [RFC8032]  Josefsson, S. and I. Liusvaara, "Edwards-Curve Digital
              Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)", RFC 8032,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8032, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8032>.

   [TWOFISH]  Schneier, B., "The Twofish Encryptions Algorithm: A
              128-Bit Block Cipher, 1st Edition", March 1999.

Authors' Addresses

   Martin Schanzenbach
   GNUnet e.V.
   Boltzmannstrasse 3
   85748 Garching
   Germany

   Email: schanzen@gnunet.org


   Christian Grothoff
   Berner Fachhochschule
   Hoeheweg 80
   CH-2501 Biel/Bienne
   Switzerland

   Email: schanzen@gnunet.org


   Bernd Fix
   GNUnet e.V.
   Boltzmannstrasse 3
   85748 Garching
   Germany

   Email: fix@gnunet.org
















Schanzenbach, et al.     Expires 24 January 2020               [Page 19]