fix; add label length fixme

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/draft-schanzen-gns.xml b/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
index 08545fc..9dcbb32 100644
--- a/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
+++ b/draft-schanzen-gns.xml
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
 <?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
 <?rfc compact="yes" ?>
 <?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
-<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" docName="draft-schanzen-gns-08" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" version="3">
+<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" docName="draft-schanzen-gns-09" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 2.26.0 -->
  <front>
   <title abbrev="The GNU Name System">
    The GNU Name System
   </title>
-  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schanzen-gns-08"/>
+  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schanzen-gns-09"/>
   <author fullname="Martin Schanzenbach" initials="M." surname="Schanzenbach">
    <organization>GNUnet e.V.</organization>
    <address>
@@ -188,9 +188,12 @@
        <dt>Label</dt>
        <dd>
          A GNS label is a label as defined in <xref target="RFC8499"/>.
-         Within this document, labels are always assumed to be strings of
-         Labels MUST follow the format for U-labels as defined in
-         in <xref target="RFC5890"/> and <xref target="RFC5891"/>.
+         Within this document, labels are always assumed to be U-labels as
+         defined in <xref target="RFC5890"/> and <xref target="RFC5891"/>.
+         <!-- FIXME U-labels MUST not be too long. Their A-label representation
+         must fit into a DNS label. Do we want this limitation for GNS?
+         Or do we define "compatibility" labels that follow this limitation?
+         -->
        </dd>
        <dt>Apex Label</dt>
        <dd>