lsd0001

LSD0001: GNU Name System
Log | Files | Refs | README

commit 39e9026ba90ffad363ae5049fc50411e95f458b9
parent 7520fd5f9b67d0aa4ef8f7d613f7e08a254a6122
Author: Martin Schanzenbach <schanzen@gnunet.org>
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:54:09 +0100

fix; add label length fixme

Diffstat:
Mdraft-schanzen-gns.xml | 13++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/draft-schanzen-gns.xml b/draft-schanzen-gns.xml @@ -34,13 +34,13 @@ <?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?> <?rfc compact="yes" ?> <?rfc subcompact="no" ?> -<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" docName="draft-schanzen-gns-08" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" version="3"> +<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" docName="draft-schanzen-gns-09" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" version="3"> <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 2.26.0 --> <front> <title abbrev="The GNU Name System"> The GNU Name System </title> - <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schanzen-gns-08"/> + <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schanzen-gns-09"/> <author fullname="Martin Schanzenbach" initials="M." surname="Schanzenbach"> <organization>GNUnet e.V.</organization> <address> @@ -188,9 +188,12 @@ <dt>Label</dt> <dd> A GNS label is a label as defined in <xref target="RFC8499"/>. - Within this document, labels are always assumed to be strings of - Labels MUST follow the format for U-labels as defined in - in <xref target="RFC5890"/> and <xref target="RFC5891"/>. + Within this document, labels are always assumed to be U-labels as + defined in <xref target="RFC5890"/> and <xref target="RFC5891"/>. + <!-- FIXME U-labels MUST not be too long. Their A-label representation + must fit into a DNS label. Do we want this limitation for GNS? + Or do we define "compatibility" labels that follow this limitation? + --> </dd> <dt>Apex Label</dt> <dd>