lsd0001

commit cd861f43f674190230d04acb57c817dfceb52ecd
parent 51fce83e9a175409075b3d908d75a49f3338c45e
Author: Martin Schanzenbach <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 21:27:25 +0200

update slides

Diffstat:
M
ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex
 | 
14
++++++--------

1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex b/ietf/secdispatch/gns.tex
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
   \begin{itemize}
     \item Identity management: \textbf{re:claimID} (\url{https://reclaim-identity.io})
     \item Social Networks: \textbf{SecuShare} (\url{https://secushare.org})
-    \item Healthcare: \textbf{Accident insurance and private health data}.\footnote{Joint work with FH Bern, ``Decentralized Authentication for Self-Sovereign Identities using Name Systems'' (DASEIN)}
+    \item Healthcare and IoT: \textbf{Accident insurance and private health data}.\footnote{Joint work with University of Applied Sciences Bern, ``Decentralized Authentication for Self-Sovereign Identities using Name Systems'' (DASEIN)}
     \item Others: \textbf{Chat}, \textbf{Host addressing}, \ldots
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -152,20 +152,18 @@
   \begin{itemize}
     \item Address received feedback:
       \begin{itemize}
-        \item Better trust agility to address questions on choice of Hierarchical Deterministic Key Derivation (HKDF). Options:
+        \item Better trust agility to address questions on choice of Hierarchical Deterministic Key Derivation (HKDF). No "standard" go-to HKDF exists at this time:
           \begin{itemize}
-            \item ECDSA w/ Cuve25519 (in draft)
-            \item Schnorr/Ed25519 (``Tor-style'')
-            \item BIP32-Ed25519\footnote{Has issues: \url{https://forum.web3.foundation/t/key-recovery-attack-on-bip32-ed25519/44}}
+            \item In draft and implemented: ECDSA (RFC6979) over Curve25519 (RFC8031).
+            \item Alternatives: Schnorr/Ed25519-based (``Tor-style'').\footnote{BIP32-Ed25519 has issues: \url{https://forum.web3.foundation/t/key-recovery-attack-on-bip32-ed25519/44}}
           \end{itemize}
         \item Update to symmetric encryption scheme for IND-CCA.
-        \item Address choice of DHT better.
-        \item Address key management / recovery.
+        \item Address other feedback.
       \end{itemize}
     \item Desired next steps at IETF:
   \begin{itemize}
     \item Receive feedback from IETF experts on protocol and document.
-    \item Is this document interesting to any existing IETF/IRTF WG?
+    \item Is this document interesting to any existing IETF/IRTF WG? Should/can a new WG be formed?
   \end{itemize}
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}