Gnome thinks unloading plugins is an unnecessary feature, so we only run Gnome code out-of-process from now on

2 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/plugins/ole2_extractor.c b/src/plugins/ole2_extractor.c
index 5f6cd01..5cef88e 100644
--- a/src/plugins/ole2_extractor.c
+++ b/src/plugins/ole2_extractor.c
@@ -475,6 +475,21 @@ history_extract(GsfInput * stream,
 }
 
 
+
+const char *
+EXTRACTOR_ole2_options ()
+{
+  /* 
+     Since the Gnome developers think that being unable to
+     unload plugins is an 'acceptable' limitation, we
+     require out-of-process execution for plugins depending
+     on libgsf and other glib-based plugins.
+     See also https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374940 
+  */
+  return "oop-only"; 
+}
+
+
 int 
 EXTRACTOR_ole2_extract (const char *data,
                         size_t size,
diff --git a/src/plugins/thumbnailgtk_extractor.c b/src/plugins/thumbnailgtk_extractor.c
index f5ea228..51e3ea4 100644
--- a/src/plugins/thumbnailgtk_extractor.c
+++ b/src/plugins/thumbnailgtk_extractor.c
@@ -41,6 +41,20 @@ void __attribute__ ((constructor)) ole_gobject_init ()
 }
 
 
+const char *
+EXTRACTOR_thumbnailgtk_options ()
+{
+  /* 
+     Since the Gnome developers think that being unable to
+     unload plugins is an 'acceptable' limitation, we
+     require out-of-process execution for plugins depending
+     on libgsf and other glib-based plugins.
+     See also https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374940 
+  */
+  return "oop-only"; 
+}
+
+
 int 
 EXTRACTOR_thumbnailgtk_extract (const char *data,
                                 size_t size,