diff options
author | Martin Schanzenbach <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> | 2021-03-12 12:47:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin Schanzenbach <mschanzenbach@posteo.de> | 2021-03-12 12:47:20 +0100 |
commit | 6930bcd5effeefcd281a9109084154ccc2cca9a6 (patch) | |
tree | 20e3eba8c41aa14743a544aa0d5f1c5ec0e900b8 /locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po | |
parent | e9120817a835508a5750ed4588246aed58b153ec (diff) | |
download | www-6930bcd5effeefcd281a9109084154ccc2cca9a6.tar.gz www-6930bcd5effeefcd281a9109084154ccc2cca9a6.zip |
start migration of faq
Diffstat (limited to 'locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po')
-rw-r--r-- | locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po | 554 |
1 files changed, 535 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po index e9e7597d..eaef6db4 100644 --- a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po +++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po | |||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ msgid "" | |||
8 | msgstr "" | 8 | msgstr "" |
9 | "Project-Id-Version: PROJECT VERSION\n" | 9 | "Project-Id-Version: PROJECT VERSION\n" |
10 | "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: EMAIL@ADDRESS\n" | 10 | "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: EMAIL@ADDRESS\n" |
11 | "POT-Creation-Date: 2021-03-03 21:41+0100\n" | 11 | "POT-Creation-Date: 2021-03-12 12:43+0100\n" |
12 | "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" | 12 | "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" |
13 | "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n" | 13 | "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n" |
14 | "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n" | 14 | "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n" |
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ msgid "About" | |||
64 | msgstr "" | 64 | msgstr "" |
65 | 65 | ||
66 | #: common/navigation.j2.inc:39 news/index.html.j2:8 | 66 | #: common/navigation.j2.inc:39 news/index.html.j2:8 |
67 | #: news/oldnews-2011.html.j2:13 news/oldnews-2013.html.j2:13 | ||
67 | #: news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:13 news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:13 | 68 | #: news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:13 news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:13 |
68 | msgid "News" | 69 | msgid "News" |
69 | msgstr "" | 70 | msgstr "" |
@@ -156,17 +157,20 @@ msgstr "" | |||
156 | msgid "FAQ" | 157 | msgid "FAQ" |
157 | msgstr "" | 158 | msgstr "" |
158 | 159 | ||
159 | #: news/index.html.j2:11 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:16 | 160 | #: news/index.html.j2:11 news/oldnews-2011.html.j2:16 |
161 | #: news/oldnews-2013.html.j2:16 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:16 | ||
160 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:16 | 162 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:16 |
161 | msgid "News posts about changes related to GNUnet such as releases and events" | 163 | msgid "News posts about changes related to GNUnet such as releases and events" |
162 | msgstr "" | 164 | msgstr "" |
163 | 165 | ||
164 | #: news/index.html.j2:16 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:21 | 166 | #: news/index.html.j2:16 news/oldnews-2011.html.j2:21 |
167 | #: news/oldnews-2013.html.j2:21 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:21 | ||
165 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:21 | 168 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:21 |
166 | msgid "subscribe to our RSS feed" | 169 | msgid "subscribe to our RSS feed" |
167 | msgstr "" | 170 | msgstr "" |
168 | 171 | ||
169 | #: news/index.html.j2:36 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:40 | 172 | #: news/index.html.j2:36 news/oldnews-2011.html.j2:40 |
173 | #: news/oldnews-2013.html.j2:40 news/oldnews-2018.html.j2:40 | ||
170 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:40 | 174 | #: news/oldnews-2019.html.j2:40 |
171 | msgid "read more" | 175 | msgid "read more" |
172 | msgstr "" | 176 | msgstr "" |
@@ -779,11 +783,123 @@ msgid "" | |||
779 | "<dd>DE67830654080004822650 (BIC/SWIFT: GENODEF1SLR)</dd> </dl>" | 783 | "<dd>DE67830654080004822650 (BIC/SWIFT: GENODEF1SLR)</dd> </dl>" |
780 | msgstr "" | 784 | msgstr "" |
781 | 785 | ||
782 | #: template/faq.html.j2:12 | 786 | #: template/faq.html.j2:12 template/faq.html.j2:21 |
787 | msgid "General" | ||
788 | msgstr "" | ||
789 | |||
790 | #: template/faq.html.j2:13 template/faq.html.j2:146 template/gns.html.j2:37 | ||
791 | msgid "Features" | ||
792 | msgstr "" | ||
793 | |||
794 | #: template/faq.html.j2:15 template/faq.html.j2:539 | ||
795 | msgid "Error messages" | ||
796 | msgstr "" | ||
797 | |||
798 | #: template/faq.html.j2:24 | ||
799 | msgid "What do I do if my question is not answered here?" | ||
800 | msgstr "" | ||
801 | |||
802 | #: template/faq.html.j2:26 | ||
803 | msgid "" | ||
804 | "A: There are many other sources of information. You can read additional " | ||
805 | "documentation or ask the question on the help-gnunet@gnu.org mailing list or " | ||
806 | "the #gnunet IRC on irc.freenode.net." | ||
807 | msgstr "" | ||
808 | |||
809 | #: template/faq.html.j2:34 | ||
810 | msgid "When are you going to release the next version?" | ||
811 | msgstr "" | ||
812 | |||
813 | #: template/faq.html.j2:36 | ||
814 | msgid "" | ||
815 | "A: The general answer is, when it is ready. A better answer may be: earlier " | ||
816 | "if you contribute (test, debug, code, document). Every release will be " | ||
817 | "anounced on the info-gnunet@gnu.org mailing list and on <a href=\"https://" | ||
818 | "planet.gnu.org\">planet GNU</a>. You can subscribe to the mailing list or " | ||
819 | "the RSS feed of this site to automatically receive a notification." | ||
820 | msgstr "" | ||
821 | |||
822 | #: template/faq.html.j2:47 | ||
823 | msgid "Is the code free?" | ||
824 | msgstr "" | ||
825 | |||
826 | #: template/faq.html.j2:49 | ||
827 | msgid "" | ||
828 | "A: GNUnet is free software, available under the <a href=\"https://www.gnu." | ||
829 | "org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html\">GNU Affero Public License (AGPL)</a>." | ||
830 | msgstr "" | ||
831 | |||
832 | #: template/faq.html.j2:56 | ||
833 | msgid "Are there any known bugs?" | ||
834 | msgstr "" | ||
835 | |||
836 | #: template/faq.html.j2:58 | ||
837 | msgid "" | ||
838 | "A: We track the list of currently known bugs in the <a href=\"https://bugs." | ||
839 | "gnunet.org/\">Mantis system</a>. Some bugs are occasionally reported " | ||
840 | "directly to developers or the developer mailing list. This is discouraged " | ||
841 | "since developers often do not have the time to feed these bugs back into the " | ||
842 | "Mantis database. Please report bugs directly to the bug tracking system. If " | ||
843 | "you believe a bug is sensitive, you can set its view status to private (this " | ||
844 | "should be the exception)." | ||
845 | msgstr "" | ||
846 | |||
847 | #: template/faq.html.j2:71 | ||
848 | msgid "Is there a graphical user interface?" | ||
849 | msgstr "" | ||
850 | |||
851 | #: template/faq.html.j2:73 | ||
852 | msgid "" | ||
853 | "A: gnunet-gtk is a separate download. The package contains various GTK+ " | ||
854 | "based graphical interfaces, including a graphical tool for configuration." | ||
855 | msgstr "" | ||
856 | |||
857 | #: template/faq.html.j2:81 | ||
858 | msgid "Why does gnunet-service-nse create a high CPU load?" | ||
859 | msgstr "" | ||
860 | |||
861 | #: template/faq.html.j2:83 | ||
862 | msgid "" | ||
863 | "A: The gnunet-service-nse process will initially compute a so-called "" | ||
864 | "proof-of-work" which is used to convince the network that your peer is " | ||
865 | "real (or, rather, make it expensive for an adversary to mount a Sybil attack " | ||
866 | "on the network size estimator). The calculation is expected to take a few " | ||
867 | "days, depending on how fast your CPU is. If the CPU load is creating a " | ||
868 | "problem for you, you can set the value "WORKDELAY" in the "" | ||
869 | "nse" section of your configuration file to a higher value. The default " | ||
870 | "is "5 ms"." | ||
871 | msgstr "" | ||
872 | |||
873 | #: template/faq.html.j2:97 | ||
874 | msgid "How does GNUnet compare to Tor?" | ||
875 | msgstr "" | ||
876 | |||
877 | #: template/faq.html.j2:99 | ||
878 | msgid "" | ||
879 | "A: Tor focuses on anonymous communication and censorship-resistance for TCP " | ||
880 | "connections and, with the Tor Browser Bundle, for the Web in particular. " | ||
881 | "GNUnet does not really have one focus; our theme is secure decentralized " | ||
882 | "networking, but that is too broad to be called a focus." | ||
883 | msgstr "" | ||
884 | |||
885 | #: template/faq.html.j2:109 | ||
886 | msgid "How does GNUnet compare to I2P?" | ||
887 | msgstr "" | ||
888 | |||
889 | #: template/faq.html.j2:111 | ||
890 | msgid "" | ||
891 | "A: Both GNUnet and I2P want to build a better, more secure, more " | ||
892 | "decentralized Internet. However, on the technical side, there are almost no " | ||
893 | "overlaps. <br><br> I2P is written in Java, and has (asymmetric) tunnels " | ||
894 | "using onion (or garlic) routing as the basis for various (anonymized) " | ||
895 | "applications. I2P is largely used via a Web frontend." | ||
896 | msgstr "" | ||
897 | |||
898 | #: template/faq.html.j2:122 | ||
783 | msgid "Is GNUnet ready for use on production systems?" | 899 | msgid "Is GNUnet ready for use on production systems?" |
784 | msgstr "" | 900 | msgstr "" |
785 | 901 | ||
786 | #: template/faq.html.j2:14 | 902 | #: template/faq.html.j2:124 |
787 | msgid "" | 903 | msgid "" |
788 | "A: GNUnet is still undergoing major development. It is largely not yet ready " | 904 | "A: GNUnet is still undergoing major development. It is largely not yet ready " |
789 | "for usage beyond developers. Your mileage will vary depending on the " | 905 | "for usage beyond developers. Your mileage will vary depending on the " |
@@ -792,24 +908,404 @@ msgid "" | |||
792 | "rewriting it (Project "Transport Next Generation [TNG]")" | 908 | "rewriting it (Project "Transport Next Generation [TNG]")" |
793 | msgstr "" | 909 | msgstr "" |
794 | 910 | ||
795 | #: template/faq.html.j2:24 | 911 | #: template/faq.html.j2:134 |
796 | msgid "Is GNUnet build using distributed ledger technologies?" | 912 | msgid "Is GNUnet build using distributed ledger technologies?" |
797 | msgstr "" | 913 | msgstr "" |
798 | 914 | ||
799 | #: template/faq.html.j2:26 | 915 | #: template/faq.html.j2:136 |
800 | msgid "" | 916 | msgid "" |
801 | "A: No. GNUnet is a new network protocol stack for building secure, " | 917 | "A: No. GNUnet is a new network protocol stack for building secure, " |
802 | "distributed, and privacy-preserving applications. While a ledger could be " | 918 | "distributed, and privacy-preserving applications. While a ledger could be " |
803 | "built using GNUnet, we currently have no plans in doing so." | 919 | "built using GNUnet, we currently have no plans in doing so." |
804 | msgstr "" | 920 | msgstr "" |
805 | 921 | ||
806 | #: template/faq.html.j2:35 | 922 | #: template/faq.html.j2:148 |
923 | msgid "What can I do with GNUnet?" | ||
924 | msgstr "" | ||
925 | |||
926 | #: template/faq.html.j2:150 | ||
927 | msgid "" | ||
928 | "A: GNUnet is a peer-to-peer framework, by which we mostly mean that it can " | ||
929 | "do more than just one thing. Naturally, the implementation and documentation " | ||
930 | "of some of the features that exist are more advanced than others." | ||
931 | msgstr "" | ||
932 | |||
933 | #: template/faq.html.j2:157 | ||
934 | msgid "" | ||
935 | "For users, GNUnet offers anonymous and non-anonymous file-sharing, a fully " | ||
936 | "decentralized and censorship-resistant replacement for DNS and a mechanism " | ||
937 | "for IPv4-IPv6 protocol translation and tunneling (NAT-PT with DNS-ALG)." | ||
938 | msgstr "" | ||
939 | |||
940 | #: template/faq.html.j2:171 | ||
941 | msgid "Who runs the GNS root zone?" | ||
942 | msgstr "" | ||
943 | |||
944 | #: template/faq.html.j2:173 | ||
945 | msgid "" | ||
946 | "A: Short answer: you. The long answer is the GNUnet will ship with a default " | ||
947 | "configuration of top-level domains. The governance of this default " | ||
948 | "configuration is not yet established. In any case, the user will be able to " | ||
949 | "modify this configuration at will. We expect normal users to have no need to " | ||
950 | "edit their own GNS zone(s) unless they host services themselves." | ||
951 | msgstr "" | ||
952 | |||
953 | #: template/faq.html.j2:184 | ||
954 | msgid "Where is the per-user GNS database kept?" | ||
955 | msgstr "" | ||
956 | |||
957 | #: template/faq.html.j2:186 | ||
958 | msgid "" | ||
959 | "A: The short answer is that the database is kept at the user's GNUnet peer. " | ||
960 | "Now, a user may run multiple GNUnet peers, in which case the database could " | ||
961 | "be kept at each peer (however, we don't have code for convenient " | ||
962 | "replication). Similarly, multiple GNUnet peers can share one instance of the " | ||
963 | "database --- the "gnunet-service-namestore" can be accessed from " | ||
964 | "remote (via TCP). The actual data can be stored in a Postgres database, for " | ||
965 | "which various replication options are again applicable. Ultimately, there " | ||
966 | "are many options for how users can store (and secure) their GNS database." | ||
967 | msgstr "" | ||
968 | |||
969 | #: template/faq.html.j2:201 | ||
970 | msgid "What is the expected average size of a GNS namestore database?" | ||
971 | msgstr "" | ||
972 | |||
973 | #: template/faq.html.j2:203 | ||
974 | msgid "" | ||
975 | "A: Pretty small. Based on our user study where we looked at browser " | ||
976 | "histories and the number of domains visited, we expect that GNS databases " | ||
977 | "will only grow to a few tens of thousands of entries, small enough to fit " | ||
978 | "even on mobile devices." | ||
979 | msgstr "" | ||
980 | |||
981 | #: template/faq.html.j2:213 | ||
982 | msgid "Is GNS resistant to the attacks on DNS used by the US?" | ||
983 | msgstr "" | ||
984 | |||
985 | #: template/faq.html.j2:215 | ||
986 | msgid "" | ||
987 | "A: We believe so, as there is no entity that any government could force to " | ||
988 | "change the mapping for a name except for each individual user (and then the " | ||
989 | "changes would only apply to the names that this user is the authority for). " | ||
990 | "So if everyone used GNS, the only practical attack of a government would be " | ||
991 | "to force the operator of a server to change the GNS records for his server " | ||
992 | "to point elsewhere. However, if the owner of the private key for a zone is " | ||
993 | "unavailable for enforcement, the respective zone cannot be changed and any " | ||
994 | "other zone delegating to this zone will achieve proper resolution." | ||
995 | msgstr "" | ||
996 | |||
997 | #: template/faq.html.j2:229 | ||
998 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and CoDoNS?" | ||
999 | msgstr "" | ||
1000 | |||
1001 | #: template/faq.html.j2:231 | ||
1002 | msgid "" | ||
1003 | "A: CoDoNS decentralizes the DNS database (using a DHT) but preserves the " | ||
1004 | "authority structure of DNS. With CoDoNS, IANA/ICANN are still in charge, and " | ||
1005 | "there are still registrars that determine who owns a name. <br><br> With " | ||
1006 | "GNS, we decentralize the database and also decentralize the responsibility " | ||
1007 | "for naming: each user runs his own personal root zone and is thus in " | ||
1008 | "complete control of the names he uses. GNS also has many additional features " | ||
1009 | "(to keep names short and enable migration) which don't even make sense in " | ||
1010 | "the context of CoDoNS." | ||
1011 | msgstr "" | ||
1012 | |||
1013 | #: template/faq.html.j2:247 | ||
1014 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and SocialDNS?" | ||
1015 | msgstr "" | ||
1016 | |||
1017 | #: template/faq.html.j2:249 | ||
1018 | msgid "" | ||
1019 | "A: Like GNS, SocialDNS allows each user to create DNS mappings. However, " | ||
1020 | "with SocialDNS the mappings are shared through the social network and " | ||
1021 | "subjected to ranking. As the social relationships evolve, names can thus " | ||
1022 | "change in surprising ways. <br><br> With GNS, names are primarily shared via " | ||
1023 | "delegation, and thus mappings will only change if the user responsible for " | ||
1024 | "the name (the authority) manually changes the record." | ||
1025 | msgstr "" | ||
1026 | |||
1027 | #: template/faq.html.j2:263 | ||
1028 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and ODDNS?" | ||
1029 | msgstr "" | ||
1030 | |||
1031 | #: template/faq.html.j2:265 | ||
1032 | msgid "" | ||
1033 | "A: ODDNS is primarily designed to bypass the DNS root zone and the TLD " | ||
1034 | "registries (such as those for \".com\" and \".org\"). Instead of using " | ||
1035 | "those, each user is expected to maintain a database of (second-level) " | ||
1036 | "domains (like \"gnu.org\") and the IP addresses of the respective name " | ||
1037 | "servers. Resolution will fail if the target name servers change IPs." | ||
1038 | msgstr "" | ||
1039 | |||
1040 | #: template/faq.html.j2:276 | ||
1041 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and Namecoin?" | ||
1042 | msgstr "" | ||
1043 | |||
1044 | #: template/faq.html.j2:283 | ||
1045 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and Handshake?" | ||
1046 | msgstr "" | ||
1047 | |||
1048 | #: template/faq.html.j2:289 | ||
1049 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and ENS?" | ||
1050 | msgstr "" | ||
1051 | |||
1052 | #: template/faq.html.j2:295 | ||
1053 | msgid "What is the difference between GNS and TrickleDNS?" | ||
1054 | msgstr "" | ||
1055 | |||
1056 | #: template/faq.html.j2:297 | ||
1057 | msgid "" | ||
1058 | "A: TrickleDNS pushes ("critical") DNS records between DNS " | ||
1059 | "resolvers of participating domains to provide "better availability, " | ||
1060 | "lower query resolution times, and faster update propagation". Thus " | ||
1061 | "TrickleDNS is focused on defeating attacks on the availability (and " | ||
1062 | "performance) of record propagation in DNS, for example via DDoS attacks on " | ||
1063 | "DNS root servers. TrickleDNS is thus concerned with how to ensure " | ||
1064 | "distribution of authoritative records, and authority remains derived from " | ||
1065 | "the DNS hierarchy." | ||
1066 | msgstr "" | ||
1067 | |||
1068 | #: template/faq.html.j2:310 | ||
1069 | msgid "" | ||
1070 | "Does GNS require real-world introduction (secure PKEY exchange) in the style " | ||
1071 | "of the PGP web of trust?" | ||
1072 | msgstr "" | ||
1073 | |||
1074 | #: template/faq.html.j2:312 | ||
1075 | msgid "" | ||
1076 | "A: For security, it is well known that an initial trust path between the two " | ||
1077 | "parties must exist. However, for applications where this is not required, " | ||
1078 | "weaker mechanisms can be used. For example, we have implemented a first-come-" | ||
1079 | "first-served (FCFS) authority which allows arbitrary users to register " | ||
1080 | "arbitrary names. The key of this authority is included with every GNUnet " | ||
1081 | "installation. Thus, any name registered with FCFS is in fact global and " | ||
1082 | "requires no further introduction. However, the security of these names " | ||
1083 | "depends entirely on the trustworthiness of the FCFS authority. The authority " | ||
1084 | "can be queried under the ".ping" TLD." | ||
1085 | msgstr "" | ||
1086 | |||
1087 | #: template/faq.html.j2:327 | ||
1088 | msgid "" | ||
1089 | "How can a legitimate domain owner tell other people to not use his name in " | ||
1090 | "GNS?" | ||
1091 | msgstr "" | ||
1092 | |||
1093 | #: template/faq.html.j2:329 | ||
1094 | msgid "" | ||
1095 | "A: Names have no owners in GNS, so there cannot be a "legitimate" " | ||
1096 | "domain owner. Any user can claim any name (as his preferred name or "" | ||
1097 | "pseudonym") in his NICK record. Similarly, all other users can choose " | ||
1098 | "to ignore this preference and use a name of their choice (or even assign no " | ||
1099 | "name) for this user." | ||
1100 | msgstr "" | ||
1101 | |||
1102 | #: template/faq.html.j2:340 | ||
1103 | msgid "" | ||
1104 | "Did you consider the privacy implications of making your personal GNS zone " | ||
1105 | "visible?" | ||
1106 | msgstr "" | ||
1107 | |||
1108 | #: template/faq.html.j2:342 | ||
1109 | msgid "" | ||
1110 | "A: Each record in GNS has a flag "private". Records are shared " | ||
1111 | "with other users (via DHT or zone transfers) only if this flag is not set. " | ||
1112 | "Thus, users have full control over what information about their zones is " | ||
1113 | "made public." | ||
1114 | msgstr "" | ||
1115 | |||
1116 | #: template/faq.html.j2:352 | ||
1117 | msgid "Are \"Legacy Host\" (LEHO) records not going to be obsolete with IPv6?" | ||
1118 | msgstr "" | ||
1119 | |||
1120 | #: template/faq.html.j2:354 | ||
1121 | msgid "" | ||
1122 | "A: The question presumes that (a) virtual hosting is only necessary because " | ||
1123 | "of IPv4 address scarcity, and (b) that LEHOs are only useful in the context " | ||
1124 | "of virtual hosting. However, LEHOs are also useful to help with X.509 " | ||
1125 | "certificate validation (as they specify for which legacy hostname the " | ||
1126 | "certificate should be valid). Also, even with IPv6 fully deployed and "" | ||
1127 | "infinite" IP addresses being available, we're not sure that virtual " | ||
1128 | "hosting would disappear. Finally, we don't want to have to wait for IPv6 to " | ||
1129 | "become commonplace, GNS should work with today's networks." | ||
1130 | msgstr "" | ||
1131 | |||
1132 | #: template/faq.html.j2:368 | ||
1133 | msgid "" | ||
1134 | "Why does GNS not use a trust metric or consensus to determine globally " | ||
1135 | "unique names?" | ||
1136 | msgstr "" | ||
1137 | |||
1138 | #: template/faq.html.j2:370 | ||
1139 | msgid "" | ||
1140 | "A: Trust metrics have the fundamental problem that they have thresholds. As " | ||
1141 | "trust relationships evolve, mappings would change their meaning as they " | ||
1142 | "cross each others thresholds. We decided that the resulting unpredictability " | ||
1143 | "of the resolution process was not acceptable. Furthermore, trust and " | ||
1144 | "consensus might be easy to manipulate by adversaries." | ||
1145 | msgstr "" | ||
1146 | |||
1147 | #: template/faq.html.j2:381 | ||
1148 | msgid "How do you handle compromised zone keys in GNS?" | ||
1149 | msgstr "" | ||
1150 | |||
1151 | #: template/faq.html.j2:383 | ||
1152 | msgid "" | ||
1153 | "A: The owner of a private key can create a revocation message. This one can " | ||
1154 | "then be flooded throughout the overlay network, creating a copy at all " | ||
1155 | "peers. Before using a public key, peers check if that key has been revoked. " | ||
1156 | "All names that involve delegation via a revoked zone will then fail to " | ||
1157 | "resolve. Peers always automatically check for the existence of a revocation " | ||
1158 | "message when resolving names." | ||
1159 | msgstr "" | ||
1160 | |||
1161 | #: template/faq.html.j2:395 | ||
1162 | msgid "Could the signing algorithm of GNS be upgraded in the future?" | ||
1163 | msgstr "" | ||
1164 | |||
1165 | #: template/faq.html.j2:397 | ||
1166 | msgid "" | ||
1167 | "A: Yes. In our efforts to standardize GNS, we have already modified the " | ||
1168 | "protocol to support alternative delegation records. <br> <br> Naturally, " | ||
1169 | "deployed GNS implementations would have to be updated to support the new " | ||
1170 | "signature scheme. The new scheme can then be run in parallel with the " | ||
1171 | "existing system by using a new record type to indicate the use of a " | ||
1172 | "different cipher system." | ||
1173 | msgstr "" | ||
1174 | |||
1175 | #: template/faq.html.j2:411 | ||
1176 | msgid "" | ||
1177 | "How can a GNS zone maintain several name servers, e.g. for load balancing?" | ||
1178 | msgstr "" | ||
1179 | |||
1180 | #: template/faq.html.j2:413 | ||
1181 | msgid "" | ||
1182 | "A: We don't expect this to be necessary, as GNS records are stored (and " | ||
1183 | "replicated) in the R5N DHT. Thus the authority will typically not be " | ||
1184 | "contacted whenever clients perform a lookup. Even if the authority goes " | ||
1185 | "(temporarily) off-line, the DHT will cache the records for some time. " | ||
1186 | "However, should having multiple servers for a zone be considered truly " | ||
1187 | "necessary, the owner of the zone can simply run multiple peers (and share " | ||
1188 | "the zone's key and database among them)." | ||
1189 | msgstr "" | ||
1190 | |||
1191 | #: template/faq.html.j2:426 | ||
1192 | msgid "" | ||
1193 | "Why do you believe it is worth giving up unique names for censorship " | ||
1194 | "resistance?" | ||
1195 | msgstr "" | ||
1196 | |||
1197 | #: template/faq.html.j2:428 | ||
1198 | msgid "" | ||
1199 | "A: The GNU Name system offers an alternative to DNS that is censorship " | ||
1200 | "resistant. As with any security mechanism, this comes at a cost (names are " | ||
1201 | "not globally unique). To draw a parallel, HTTPS connections use more " | ||
1202 | "bandwidth and have higher latency than HTTP connections. Depending on your " | ||
1203 | "application, HTTPS may not be worth the cost. However, for users that are " | ||
1204 | "experiencing censorship (or are concerned about it), giving up globally " | ||
1205 | "unique names may very well be worth the cost. After all, what is a "" | ||
1206 | "globally" unique name worth, if it does not resolve?" | ||
1207 | msgstr "" | ||
1208 | |||
1209 | #: template/faq.html.j2:442 | ||
1210 | msgid "Why do you say that DNS is 'centralized' and 'distributed'?" | ||
1211 | msgstr "" | ||
1212 | |||
1213 | #: template/faq.html.j2:444 | ||
1214 | msgid "" | ||
1215 | "A: We say that DNS is 'centralized' because it has a central component / " | ||
1216 | "central point of failure --- the root zone and its management by IANA/ICANN. " | ||
1217 | "This centralization creates vulnerabilities. For example, the US government " | ||
1218 | "was able to reassign the management of the country-TLDs of Afganistan and " | ||
1219 | "Iraq during the wars at the beginning of the 21st century." | ||
1220 | msgstr "" | ||
1221 | |||
1222 | #: template/faq.html.j2:455 | ||
1223 | msgid "How does GNS protect against layer-3 censorship?" | ||
1224 | msgstr "" | ||
1225 | |||
1226 | #: template/faq.html.j2:457 | ||
1227 | msgid "" | ||
1228 | "A: GNS does not directly help with layer-3 censorship, but it does help " | ||
1229 | "indirectly in two ways: <ol> <li> Many websites today use virtual hosting, " | ||
1230 | "so blocking a particular IP address causes much more collateral damage than " | ||
1231 | "blocking a DNS name. It thus raises the cost of censorship.</li> <li> " | ||
1232 | "Existing layer-3 circumvention solutions (such as Tor) would benefit from a " | ||
1233 | "censorship resistant naming system. Accessing Tor's ".onion" " | ||
1234 | "namespace currently requires users to use unmemorable cryptographic " | ||
1235 | "identifiers. With nicer names, Tor and tor2web-like services would be even " | ||
1236 | "easier to use. </ol>" | ||
1237 | msgstr "" | ||
1238 | |||
1239 | #: template/faq.html.j2:476 | ||
1240 | msgid "Does GNS work with search engines?" | ||
1241 | msgstr "" | ||
1242 | |||
1243 | #: template/faq.html.j2:478 | ||
1244 | msgid "" | ||
1245 | "A: GNS creates no significant problems for search engines, as they can use " | ||
1246 | "GNS to perform name resolution as well as any normal user. Naturally, while " | ||
1247 | "we typically expect normal users to install custom software for name " | ||
1248 | "resolution, this is unlikely to work for search engines today. However, the " | ||
1249 | "DNS2GNS gateway allows search engines to use DNS to resolve GNS names, so " | ||
1250 | "they can still index GNS resources. However, as using DNS2GNS gateways " | ||
1251 | "breaks the cryptographic chain of trust, legacy search engines will " | ||
1252 | "obviously not obtain censorship-resistant names." | ||
1253 | msgstr "" | ||
1254 | |||
1255 | #: template/faq.html.j2:492 | ||
1256 | msgid "How does GNS compare to the Unmanaged Internet Architecture (UIA)?" | ||
1257 | msgstr "" | ||
1258 | |||
1259 | #: template/faq.html.j2:494 | ||
1260 | msgid "" | ||
1261 | "A: UIA and GNS both share the same basic naming model, which actually " | ||
1262 | "originated with Rivest's SDSI. However, UIA is not concerned about " | ||
1263 | "integration with legacy applications and instead focuses on universal " | ||
1264 | "connectivity between a user's many machines. In contrast, GNS was designed " | ||
1265 | "to interoperate with DNS as much as possible, and to also work as much as " | ||
1266 | "possible with the existing Web infrastructure. UIA is not at all concerned " | ||
1267 | "about legacy systems (clean slate)." | ||
1268 | msgstr "" | ||
1269 | |||
1270 | #: template/faq.html.j2:507 | ||
1271 | msgid "Doesn't GNS increase the trusted-computing base compared to DNS(SEC)?" | ||
1272 | msgstr "" | ||
1273 | |||
1274 | #: template/faq.html.j2:509 | ||
1275 | msgid "" | ||
1276 | "A: First of all, in GNS you can explicitly see the trust chain, so you know " | ||
1277 | "if a name you are resolving belongs to a friend, or a friend-of-a-friend, " | ||
1278 | "and can thus decide how much you trust the result. Naturally, the trusted-" | ||
1279 | "computing base (TCB) can become arbitrarily large this way --- however, " | ||
1280 | "given the name length restriction, for an individual name it is always less " | ||
1281 | "than about 128 entities." | ||
1282 | msgstr "" | ||
1283 | |||
1284 | #: template/faq.html.j2:521 | ||
1285 | msgid "" | ||
1286 | "How does GNS handle SRV/TLSA records where service and protocol are part of " | ||
1287 | "the domain name?" | ||
1288 | msgstr "" | ||
1289 | |||
1290 | #: template/faq.html.j2:523 | ||
1291 | msgid "" | ||
1292 | "A: When GNS splits a domain name into labels for resolution, it detects the " | ||
1293 | ""_Service._Proto" syntax, converts "Service" to the " | ||
1294 | "corresponding port number and "Proto" to the corresponding " | ||
1295 | "protocol number. The rest of the name is resolved as usual. Then, when the " | ||
1296 | "result is presented, GNS looks for the GNS-specific "BOX" record " | ||
1297 | "type. A BOX record is a record that contains another record (such as SRV or " | ||
1298 | "TLSA records) and adds a service and protocol number (and the original boxed " | ||
1299 | "record type) to it." | ||
1300 | msgstr "" | ||
1301 | |||
1302 | #: template/faq.html.j2:541 | ||
807 | msgid "" | 1303 | msgid "" |
808 | "I receive many "WARNING Calculated flow delay for X at Y for Z". " | 1304 | "I receive many "WARNING Calculated flow delay for X at Y for Z". " |
809 | "Should I worry?" | 1305 | "Should I worry?" |
810 | msgstr "" | 1306 | msgstr "" |
811 | 1307 | ||
812 | #: template/faq.html.j2:37 | 1308 | #: template/faq.html.j2:543 |
813 | msgid "" | 1309 | msgid "" |
814 | "A: Right now, this is expected and a known cause for high latency in GNUnet. " | 1310 | "A: Right now, this is expected and a known cause for high latency in GNUnet. " |
815 | "We have started a major rewrite to address this and other problems, but " | 1311 | "We have started a major rewrite to address this and other problems, but " |
@@ -817,14 +1313,38 @@ msgid "" | |||
817 | "expected." | 1313 | "expected." |
818 | msgstr "" | 1314 | msgstr "" |
819 | 1315 | ||
820 | #: template/faq.html.j2:46 | 1316 | #: template/faq.html.j2:552 |
821 | msgid "Is there a graphical user interface?" | 1317 | msgid "Error opening `/dev/net/tun': No such file or directory?" |
822 | msgstr "" | 1318 | msgstr "" |
823 | 1319 | ||
824 | #: template/faq.html.j2:48 | 1320 | #: template/faq.html.j2:554 |
825 | msgid "" | 1321 | msgid "" |
826 | "A: gnunet-gtk is a separate download. The package contains various GTK+ " | 1322 | "A: If you get this error message, the solution is simple. Issue the " |
827 | "based graphical interfaces, including a graphical tool for configuration." | 1323 | "following commands (as root) to create the required device file" |
1324 | msgstr "" | ||
1325 | |||
1326 | #: template/faq.html.j2:566 | ||
1327 | msgid "" | ||
1328 | "'iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.' (when running gnunet-service-" | ||
1329 | "dns)?" | ||
1330 | msgstr "" | ||
1331 | |||
1332 | #: template/faq.html.j2:568 | ||
1333 | msgid "" | ||
1334 | "A: For GNUnet DNS, your iptables needs to have "owner" match " | ||
1335 | "support. This is accomplished by having the correct kernel options. Check if " | ||
1336 | "your kernel has CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER set to either 'y' or " | ||
1337 | "'m' (and the module is loaded)." | ||
1338 | msgstr "" | ||
1339 | |||
1340 | #: template/faq.html.j2:580 | ||
1341 | msgid "'Timeout was reached' when running PT on Fedora (and possibly others)?" | ||
1342 | msgstr "" | ||
1343 | |||
1344 | #: template/faq.html.j2:582 | ||
1345 | msgid "" | ||
1346 | "A: If you get an error stating that the VPN timeout was reached, check if " | ||
1347 | "your firewall is enabled and blocking the connections." | ||
828 | msgstr "" | 1348 | msgstr "" |
829 | 1349 | ||
830 | #: template/glossary.html.j2:12 | 1350 | #: template/glossary.html.j2:12 |
@@ -931,10 +1451,6 @@ msgstr "" | |||
931 | msgid "Overview" | 1451 | msgid "Overview" |
932 | msgstr "" | 1452 | msgstr "" |
933 | 1453 | ||
934 | #: template/gns.html.j2:37 | ||
935 | msgid "Features" | ||
936 | msgstr "" | ||
937 | |||
938 | #: template/gns.html.j2:39 | 1454 | #: template/gns.html.j2:39 |
939 | msgid "" | 1455 | msgid "" |
940 | "The GNU Name System (GNS) is secure and decentralized naming system. It " | 1456 | "The GNU Name System (GNS) is secure and decentralized naming system. It " |